The Biden-Harris Administration's final rule on mental health coverage, intended to ensure parity with physical health benefits, has received mixed reactions. While supporters praise the rule for increasing transparency and accountability, critics argue it could raise costs and complicate compliance without effectively expanding access to mental health care. Click here for article.
The final rule mandates that mental health benefits be provided on par with physical health benefits and requires health plans to assess provider networks and prior authorization practices.
Supporters, including the American Medical Association and mental health advocates, view the rule as a significant step towards achieving true mental health parity.
Critics, such as AHIP and Blue Cross Blue Shield, argue the rule could increase costs and complicate compliance, potentially hindering access to mental health care.
The rule’s implementation will be phased, with some provisions taking effect in 2025 and others in 2026.
댓글